Please wait. Contacting image service... loading

Article text

NEW METHODS TO PREVAIL
Owners Forced to Tie Up
Judge Beeby added that in the new
award there would be new methods. The
Court would always be oijen to both
parties,- and an endeavor would be mane
to visit the most important ports in Aus
t.raJia, so. that a thorough understa.iidiu2
of the cpnriitioiib could be obtained. The j
Court would not make anv more interim j
awards, but must wait until a new nwanl I
was issued. Jf the final award failed to
meet with the requirements of the union. I
then the union must be prepared to face I
an -application for de-registration. - '
Commenting on . the ...present dispute.!
Judire Beebv said that there hart tjcen n»
doubt that Uie owners had been forced to
tie up their ships. He was convinced
also that the pick-up issue \m4 never !-cen
. comprehensively dealt with in the Arbi
?tration, Court. Bv ? enforcing one pick-up
in. spine /ports the union had ; comniittcrt.
breaches -of the award, which the pjnnlov
ers bad not brought, before 'the; Court on j-
specific, motion. Their failure to dp so
had led the rank and f.le of the union f»
accent one pick-un. as their risrht.
'I do not think.'7 said Judge Beebv
''that this issue should be allowed to in'
volve the Commonwealth in a disastrous
contlict. which would inflict almost irr-*
parable injury on industry ami cor/--
merec.'
Judge Beeby concluded br savin? thai
he was prepared to restore the matter to
the list, upon the application of either
Bid'e in, the dispute.
$