Image TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage Tile
Image size: 6656x8704 Scale: 35% - PanoJS3
Page overview thumbnail

Article text

COST OF PARLIAMENTARY
COMMITTEES.
— Herald.
[?] will he caused when it
[?] what the Fish Committee
[?] It will be remembered that when
[?] consented to the appointment of
tit to £kq a M P e Dditure was limited by
®>», W course, people Riniied at
,tto »6nt no» 9 neBt )°" arose had the Go
ti“iimnlo w ' r tolimit expenditure in
c "st f« r As a f“et the committee
*« ' n dicated° re t * IR " After this enm
'kctmunitu * B '* m * t °f expenditure
?t»t vtonu' 6 0t * * , '" t Govern
not rnKll y be parsimonious
" SD S. Tlie "^P rns P e et of good work being
■”" t of Com, ntltee baa not
“ r ®°pkini ® ue °f its members,
L’Nie 0 f A 'L. A , generously bore the
***’*'• nodej' v South Wales outing.
?««k six or seven times
lll! nd?ij. -r, spent as that originally
*^ !sl Comn« j la b Committee lias been
*'S s?I dw,th arece “ t Royal Com.
1 f,. r 08 f '“"cheou, after every
d?s°«'nm D L! re : , a " d very mncll aII
I:i tiss tooJ* , n "f champagne and solid
11 been tr.u i) lce '. The Pish Committee
,te P u blic m on ' Rt 'tmust not spend any
$