Image TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage TileImage Tile
Image size: 6656x8192 Scale: 35% - PanoJS3
Page overview thumbnail

Article text

Tomcit'tic j litdTfig ence.
[IY oUR RnPORTER?R.
SUPREME1 COUR-T,
SIVIL(, SIYLE.
AIloiDAy, Ocr?,Rn. ' 28Tu.-1Before the
C(niIt Ju'ri1iE andt a special Jury.
Cluam/l,er.s v. Parl/,.-T'l,'lhis was an action
in the case cf ai nuiisance. ' Ver?liic for the
defendant.
Tu?,,I)A\v, OcTonBER '29TH -l etr aTid
Fl;,'s v. Suolo'Mn" herY.-T..lthis was an action.
oni a covenant of an agreement, dartedOctober,
18]3:, respecting seal-skins,' which the defend.
ant had not fulfilled. Verdict for Defeudant.
\VEDSNESD.Y. OCTOBER, "20i(i* -lBefure.
Mr. ,I u-aers I)uOt'LtvC, and a special Jury.
Sep,aon "v. Cobci'fl and others.--'l'lis as
aln aiction of tresplass. The Plaintiff was a
tiLket of leave man, and camuie into posses
siona of property, by nmarriage, and remnaijned
in posse.siuin after the demise 'of his wife.
l)efelhndants had forcealtly e'neredl'l his llretitises
and carried ftl" his lpretifsies'the said property,
alt egitig, that defendalilhat bIeing a felon adthohll
ing only a 'tiket.of lei'Ce, couldt notretain the
propl'erty, and that they, as relatives or con
niix:onl bly a previova inariaige, of deceased,
were 'eat enltitled to tlh sal c. ll r. JUSTIeE
I)owi L.(i suainlied Iup in favour of"the plain.
tilt: Vetdi Lt for the 'defeldtlnlls; on the
ground, thlat'plainlifit coilthl not suc'in a court
of JusLice' according to the late Act of Par
liament.
M I. JaTrrCE" DOiWLIO' r?used to'certify
that this was a proper case for a special Jury.
Young and Adamnson, v. Iniel..-'I his was anl
action for the rectvery of .1i33 18s. (Id. for
work and labour. Plaintiff non-suited, on tihe
groundl that the wai k aand labsour hald not
een i "peatforllied propel(I ly and conl'pletly,
according to cointract.
8. Lyons v. A. Iaons--1This was an'action
to recover the sumn of 1001, avalnced deftzlndl
nnlt to tie returlied.l Plaintif alol-nsuited, on a
point of law.
Air, Ilurton, olbservinrg s Catliolic wifness
albout to crossaltihstself, dlhjected to Ihis doinag so,
understandling" that the lodter orders of the
Catholic pers~nsioil used "this ceremolny, not
as anl act of devout reverendc merely, but too
often as justifying a Inlnital rPservation. ' The
Catholic clh isy cullid explain this lpoint of
Cl(iiClceliet.
$