Please wait. Contacting image service... loading

Article text

SIVYER V. MALLINSON.
To the Editor.
SIR-In to-day's issue of your journal
you state under the above heading that the
Chief Justice granted an injunction re-
straining the sale of the plaintiff's interest
in the syndicate to the extent of 40 shares
of 100 each fully paid-up in the syndicate,
which would make it appear that the
Supreme Court had decided that Sivyer
had an interest in the Queen of Sheba
mine, whereas that question has not been
decided, and will not be decided until the
case is fully gone into by the Supreme
Court in December next, and the judge did
not make such an order as stated.
The application in Chambers for an injunction
amounted to merely a preliminary
hearing of whether Sivyer had any
possible claim on the Queen of Sheba
mine. The shares held by him belong to
the Ironstone mine (now defunct), the fer-
mer name of the mine, which is now the
Queen of Sheba mine.
The real order made by the Chief Justice
was made by consent of the Attorney-General,
and was as fellows -" injunction
by consent to protect 40 shares of £10 lead
in the Queen of Sheba Syndicate. Costs to
follow the event of action. Trial in De
cent over."
We should be glad of your publishing
this correction to save any misapprehension
by shareholders in the Queen of Sheba
-Yours, etc.,
STONE AND BURT.
Perth. November 6.
$