Lists (None yet)

Login to create lists

Tagged (None yet)

Add Tags

Comments (None yet)

Add New Comment

3 corrections, most recently by Newporter - Show corrections



Sir, - Permit me to direct your attention to the ver dan- gerous pastime which has recently become so popular in   and about the city of Sydney. I refer to the "Blondin business." Recently when passing Liverpool-street, my   attention was attracted by a vast multitude of people, gathered together to witness the performance of a "Blo-       din." He was walking a rope in mid-air, which must have   been fully as high from the ground as is usual with   the wires of our telegraph lines. I apprehended that and sport by which a man's life is placed in   jeopardy is not only dangerous, but unlawful, and although I must admit that the performer at Liverpool-street appeared     to be a perfect master of his business, yet it surely is not     right to permit such dangerous pastimes. Not only did the     performer himself risk his own life, but a youngster of, I     should think, not more than eight years of age was fastened       on his back and carried by him across the perilous rope. I do not think it is right that a man should be permitted to risk the life of a young child with impunity, and I appre- hend that if the child had been killed by any accident whilst so exposed to danger, the performer would have been liable to a criminal prosecution. The law on this point is laid down by "Russel, on Crimes and Misdemeanours" vol. I page   854, fourth edition, as follows: - "Where sports are unlaw-   ful in themselves, or productive of danger, riot, or disorder, so as to endanger the peace, and death ensue in the pursuit of them, the party killing is guilty of manslaughter." It   is further stated that while "such manly sports and exer- cises as tend to give strength, activity, and skill in the use of arms, and are entered into as private recreations amongst     friends, are not deemed unlawful sports, yet prize   fighting, public boxing matches, or any other sports of a similar kind, which are exhibited for lucre and   tend to encourage idleness by drawing together a   number of disorderly people have met with a different con- sideration." And to go a step further, it is very difficult           to draw the line between the liability of the spectators of   such performances and those of a "Tild" or "Tournament,"  

with respect to which it is thus laid down in "Aribold's       Handling Evidence in Criminal Cases," page 683, 18th   ed. :="A tilt or tournament, the martial diversion of our ancestors, was nevertheless an unlawful act ; and so are       boxing and sword-playing, the suceeding amusements of         their posterity. See R v. Perkins 4 c, and p. 537 ; R. v. Hargrave, 5 e. and p. 170 ; R. v. Murphy, 6 e. and p. 103. Therefore, if a knight in the former case or a gladiator     in the latter be killed such killing is manslaugher - 4 Bl.

Corn. 183." "And in cases of this kind, however fair the   light may have been, all who are present at it and parties       to it are equally guilty of manslaughter-R. v. Turner,   4 F. and F. 339."        

'This is a matter' for the interference of the Legislature, and I trust ere long they will take some stepes to prevent

such dangerous exhibitions. LEX.


Mr. ünillio (Jochmno (sayo Whiirhall) who retires from tim ropresinliition of tho Mo of Wight on t io dissolution of tho present Parliament, has said ndiou toms constituents at Newport, who sped tho parting ga°«nT dinnor. This worthy Parliamentary veteran, wfloso olectionooring exploits inoludo two unsuccessful ngura «J Southampton, where ho had os an antagonist mo JA

Chiof Justico of England (Sir Alexander Cockburn), w« reooivo in duo course tho recognition which his sUUC^1

tho party dosorvo-tranalution to that Chanibor whoio con-j stituunts ceiibo fronUionhling and .tho.jaded politician is «.


Digitisation generously supported by
Vincent Fairfax Family Foundation
Digitisation generously supported by