English, Article edition: A decision support framework for internal audit prioritization in a rental car company: A combined use between DEA and AHP Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki; Shang, Jennifer; Chiang, Wen-Chyuan

User activity

Share to:
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/10275
Physical Description
  • article
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • A decision support framework for internal audit prioritization in a rental car company: A combined use between DEA and AHP
Author
  • Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki
  • Shang, Jennifer
  • Chiang, Wen-Chyuan
Physical Description
  • article
Notes
  • Corporate scandals such as those at Tyco, Enron, and WorldCom have caused the decline of public trust in accounting and reporting practices. In response, US passed the Sarbanes Oxley Law (Sarbanes) in 2002, the most important corporate governance law since securities laws in 1930s. Section 302 of Sarbanes mandates corporations to ensure accurate financial disclosure and to take greater financial reporting and control responsibilities. Management is required to make an annual assertion regarding the design and effectiveness of company's internal controls. Consequently, many internal auditing resources are stretched. The objective of this case study is to develop a multi-criteria decision making aid that can identify the most critical businesses units within a corporation. Using the aid, we can use efficiently and effectively the internal auditing resources. Internal audits determine if the accounting processes and systems are working as intended. It focuses on the reliability of the accounting data and evaluates business through financial, operational, and compliance review. It assesses the risk of asset loss, studies business processes, and identifies opportunities to improve efficiency and effectiveness. This study explores the potential of applying data envelopment analysis (DEA) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to determine the business units that need audit. Compared with conventional methods, the proposed combined model incorporates a much wider range of quantitative and qualitative criteria, and provides a more detailed and thorough study. The proposed evaluation framework is comprehensive and flexible and it shows great potential for internal audit prioritization and resource allocation.
  • Auditing Data envelopment analysis Analytic hierarchy process Multiple criteria analysis Competitiveness
  • RePEc:eee:ejores:v:199:y:2009:i:1:p:219-231
Language
  • English
Contributed by
OAIster

Get this edition

Other links

  • Set up My libraries

    How do I set up "My libraries"?

    In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen.

  • All (1)
  • Unknown (1)
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment