English, Article edition: The Public Revenue Sharing Scheme as a Budget Policy Tool Gerhard Lehner

User activity

Share to:
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/99979
Physical Description
  • article
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • The Public Revenue Sharing Scheme as a Budget Policy Tool
Author
  • Gerhard Lehner
Physical Description
  • article
Notes
  • The new revenue sharing law has hardly changed the distribution of public funds among the federal government, Länder, and communities as compared to previous laws, except that the distribution key for joint federal taxes (for income-based and inheritance taxes) has clearly shifted in favour of the federal government, which, with the exception of ATS 1 billion, claims all additional revenues flowing from the tax measures provided for in the laws accompanying the budgets for 2000 and 2001. As a result, the federal share of the joint federal taxes rises, and will again grow in 2002 by which time the federal government will receive 70.2 percent of the joint federal tax revenues available for distribution. Since the provinces have undertaken, within the scope of the growth and stability pact, to achieve a surplus of 0.75 percent of GDP, and local governments are set to achieve a balanced budget, tensions are expected to rise in view of the narrowing leeway open to the provinces and communities. Nevertheless the new revenue sharing scheme and the law covering earmarked contributions show a trend towards lesser use of earmarked funds, which in turn widens the margin given to the provinces. The legal frame for transfer payments has remained widely unchanged. The smaller communities were able to negotiate for a greater portion of the horizontal distribution of revenue shares: they will now get a higher base amount which will rise annually for the duration of the current scheme. Consequently, the share obtained by the smaller communities will increase at the expense of larger municipalities – first indications of growing solidarity between communities. In the longer term it will be necessary to refocus the revenue sharing scheme on responsibilities. The object should be to reduce the enormous transfers between territorial authorities (almost ATS 200 billion in 1999) and replace them by a distribution of revenue shares on the basis of financing responsibilities, so that performance and its financing are more closely linked. This implies not just changing the financing system, but also further departing from the earmarking practice which aggravates efforts by the provinces and communities to achieve the goals of the stability pact. Greater emphasis on responsibility-focused distribution of revenue shares would also meet the demand for more competition between regions without the need to change fiscal sovereignty. In Austria, greater consideration of the source principle would be problematic for revenue distribution as it would compound regional problems. Altogether, the new revenue sharing scheme needs to be viewed as being only an intermediate step towards comprehensive change and restructuring of future financial relations between territorial authorities.
  • Finanzausgleich als Instrument der Budgetpolitik; The Public Revenue Sharing Scheme as a Budget Policy Tool
  • RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2001:i:8:p:497-511
  • The public revenue sharing scheme regulates the distribution of tax revenues among the federal, state and local governments and that of transfers from the federal level. As a consequence of the centralised tax revenue system it is the central financing source for the state and local authorities. With the establishment of the intra-Austrian Stability Pact, the scheme is set to gain even more importance. While the new revenue sharing law has had little effect on the structure of financial relations between territorial authorities, it nevertheless directs additional tax revenues to the federal government and at the same time strengthens the financial position of the smaller communities. Reduced use of the earmarking practice widens the financial leeway of the state and local governments. Nevertheless, the new scheme still falls short of focusing on the responsibilities and performance rates of each level of government.
  • Taxation Authorities, Public Revenue Sharing Scheme, Austria; The Public Revenue Sharing Scheme as a Budget Policy Tool
  • RePEc:wfo:wquart:y:2001:i:4:p:168-184
Language
  • English
Contributed by
OAIster

Get this edition

  • Set up My libraries

    How do I set up "My libraries"?

    In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen.

  • All (1)
  • Unknown (1)
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment