English, Article edition: Redistribution by the State in Austria Alois Guger

User activity

Share to:
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/97825
Physical Description
  • article
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • Redistribution by the State in Austria
Author
  • Alois Guger
Physical Description
  • article
Notes
  • Although the size of the public sector is large in Austria, its redistributive impact from high to low income classes is limited: on the revenue side, indirect taxation is high and, on the expenditure side, the principle of horizontal equity is prevalent. In Austria, income and property taxation is low and only moderately progressive due to a number of tax concessions which lower the tax rate for high incomes substantially. Indirect taxes and social security contributions which have a clearly regressive effect on the distribution make up more than 70 percent of all public revenues. Thus, the degree of progression of public revenues is only moderate. Public expenditures amount to more than 50 percent of GDP in Austria. Eligibility and hence the distribution of public expenditures are dominated by the principle of horizontal equity and means testing is of hardly any importance. Consequently, in actual terms most public benefits are received by higher income classes with larger household size. Only unemployment benefits, unemployment assistance and special assistance for single mothers are, in actual terms, distributed to low-income groups to a significant extent. In spite of this, low-income classes receive proportionately more public benefits than high-income groups. Thus, the expenditure side is clearly progressive: the first decile has 50 percent more income after redistribution than before, the fifth decile loses 10 percent and the top decile about 25 percent.
  • Umverteilung durch den Staat in Österreich; Redistribution by the State in Austria
  • RePEc:wfo:monber:y:1996:i:10:p:635-652
  • Although the size of the public sector is large in Austria, its redistributive impact from high to low income classes is limited: on the revenue side, income and property taxation is low and only moderately progressive but indirect taxation is high. Thus, the degree of progression of public revenues is only moderate. Although, the expenditure side is dominated by the principle of horizontal equity the redistributive impact of public expenditures is clearly progressive: low-income classes receive proportionately more public benefits than high-income groups.
  • RePEc:wfo:wquart:y:1996:i:4:p:185-196
Language
  • English
Contributed by
OAIster

Get this edition

  • Set up My libraries

    How do I set up "My libraries"?

    In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen.

  • All (1)
  • Unknown (1)
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment