English, Article edition: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Enoxaparin versus Unfractionated Heparin in the Secondary Prevention of Acute Coronary Syndrome Max Brosa; Carlos Rubio-Terres; Ibrahim Farr; ...

User activity

Share to:
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/94433
Physical Description
  • article
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Enoxaparin versus Unfractionated Heparin in the Secondary Prevention of Acute Coronary Syndrome
Author
  • Max Brosa
  • Carlos Rubio-Terres
  • Ibrahim Farr
  • Vijay Nadipelli
  • Jenaro Froufe
Physical Description
  • article
Notes
  • Background: The Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11B studies revealed that enoxaparin reduced the incidence of death, myocardial reinfarction and recurrent angina in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH). Objective: To perform a pharmacoeconomic analysis to evaluate the cost effectiveness of treatment with enoxaparin compared with UFH in Spanish patients with ACS. Design and setting: Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis using data and costs from Spanish sources, conducted from the perspective of the National Health System. Patients, interventions and outcomes measures: The study was based on the results of the ESSENCE and TIMI 11B clinical trials, which included more than 7000 patients with ACS treated with enoxaparin or UFH. The main variables studied were the success rate, expressed as patients with no complications (reinfarction, unstable angina or death), and the decrease in the utilisation of healthcare resources (revascularisation procedures and hospitalisation). Results: The base-case results of the analysis showed superior efficacy and lower total treatment and follow-up costs with enoxaparin compared with UFH. The total savings in direct health costs per patient with enoxaparin ranged between 448 and 659 euros (time horizons of 1 month and 1 year, respectively) [2001 values]. The sensitivity analysis results confirmed the advantage of enoxaparin in all cases, except in one scenario: when simultaneously using all the minimum values of the confidence interval for absolute risk reduction (ARR) in the utilisation of health resources. Conclusions: This study suggests that enoxaparin is a more effective and less expensive treatment option than UFH in secondary prevention of patients with ACS in Spain, confirming the results obtained in other pharmacoeconomic analyses performed in the UK, USA, France and Canada.
  • Acute coronary syndromes, Antithrombotics, Cost effectiveness, Enoxaparin sodium, Heparin, Pharmacoeconomics
  • RePEc:wkh:phecon:v:20:y:2002:i:14:p:979-987
Language
  • English
Contributed by
OAIster

Get this edition

  • Set up My libraries

    How do I set up "My libraries"?

    In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen.

  • All (1)
  • Unknown (1)
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment