English, Article edition: Comparison of Individual and Group Valuation of Health State Scenarios across Communities in West Africa Anayo Fidelis Akunne; John F.P. Bridges; Mamadou Sanon; ...

User activity

Share to:
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/93320
Physical Description
  • article
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • Comparison of Individual and Group Valuation of Health State Scenarios across Communities in West Africa
Author
  • Anayo Fidelis Akunne
  • John F.P. Bridges
  • Mamadou Sanon
  • Rainer Sauerborn
Physical Description
  • article
Notes
  • Background: The correct valuation of health state scenarios is important for economic analyses, disease burden assessment and setting clinical guidelines. However, it is unclear whether we should use individual or group valuations. We aimed to compare individual and group valuations of a range of clinically and culturally relevant health state scenarios in a West African population. Methods: Seventy subjects were purposely selected from seven randomly selected communities in a health district in Burkina Faso. Subjects were presented with ten health state scenarios. The valuation of the scenarios was with a culturally adapted visual analogue scale. Fixed-effects ANOVA were used to compare individual valuations from the seven locations. A paired t-test was used to compare individual mean and group valuations. The differences in the ranking of valuations were investigated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Results: On average, group valuations of the disability associated with the scenarios were higher than individual mean valuations by 20% (p =​ 0.00). The range of group valuations was wider than that of individual mean valuations. The differences in individual valuations of five scenarios across communities were significant (p <=​ 0.01). Within the communities, group and individual rankings of scenarios differed. Across five communities, they correlated significantly and positively. Conclusions: Groups valued the disability associated with health state scenarios as being more severe than individuals. Group valuations could more clearly identify the preferences of different community groups. The use of one group's opinion in setting priorities and making guidelines that relate to the public still requires some caution. Policies that do not account for systematic subgroup differences should be made with caution.
  • Utility-measurement
  • RePEc:wkh:aheahp:v:5:y:2006:i:4:p:261-268
Language
  • English
Contributed by
OAIster

Get this edition

  • Set up My libraries

    How do I set up "My libraries"?

    In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen.

  • All (1)
  • Unknown (1)
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment