English, Article, Journal or magazine article edition: The Economic Cost of China's New De-sulfur Policy During Her Gradual Accession to WTO: The Case of Industrial SO2 Emission Jie He

User activity

Share to:
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/81529
Physical Description
  • preprint
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • The Economic Cost of China's New De-sulfur Policy During Her Gradual Accession to WTO: The Case of Industrial SO2 Emission
Author
  • Jie He
Physical Description
  • preprint
Notes
  • To understand the potential impacts of China's accession to WTO in her new de-sulfur policy (gradual reduction of 10% of annual SO2 emission by 2005 with respect to that of 2000), we construct a CGE model in which SO2 emission is directly linked to energy input consumption in production. The model equally considers the substitution possibility between energies of different SO2 effluent ratio by including energy as traditional production factor as labor and capital in the constant elasticity of transformation production function. The positive externality of trade on China's economy is also included. This model is then calibrated into a 55-sector Chinese SAM for the year 1997. Four policy simulations (Business as Usual, Openness policy only, De-sulfur policy only, and the combination of openness and de-sulfur policy) are firstly made for 1997 till 2005. The results show the environmental impact of trade, though proven to be "negative", stays rather modest. This is owing to the industrial composition transformation that deviates the specialisation of Chinese economy towards labour-intensive sector under the new trade liberalization process. We do not find proof for "pollution haven" hypothesis. Although seemingly to be ambitious, the new de-sulfur policy will only bring very slight economic growth loss. The pollution reduction will mainly be realized by the substitution between polluting and less or non-polluting energies. The combination of the trade liberalization and pollution control policies seems to give China more flexibility in adapting her economy to the new de-sulfur objective. Considering different aspect together, the total economy loss due to new de-sulfur policy will be limited to only -0.26% under the presence of trade liberalization. The second part of this research contributes to double dividend analysis, where we further add to the two scenarios in which the new pollution control policy is applied along with two tax reform schemes aiming at reducing the distortion in original producer's tax system. The results confirm the double dividend hypothesis. Instead of transferring directly in a simple lump-sum form to households, the increased environmental tax revenue due to new de-sulfur policy, if used to reduce (either partially or thoroughly) the original distortion in producer's tax, can not only bring obvious economic efficiency and welfare improvement, but also facilitate the substitution of coal by the other less polluting energies and finally aid China to achieve her de-sulfur objective.
  • CGE, Trade, Industrial SO2 pollution, Energy substitution, Externality, Divisia index decomposition, double dividend, and large country hypothesis
  • RePEc:eep:tpaper:tp200408t1
Language
  • English
Contributed by
OAIster

Get this edition

Other links

  • Set up My libraries

    How do I set up "My libraries"?

    In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen.

  • All (1)
  • Unknown (1)
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment