English, Article, Journal or magazine article edition: What explains the quantity and quality of local inventive activity? Gerald Carlino; Robert Hunt

User activity

Share to:
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/6866
Physical Description
  • preprint
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • What explains the quantity and quality of local inventive activity?
Author
  • Gerald Carlino
  • Robert Hunt
Physical Description
  • preprint
Notes
  • The authors geocode a data set of patents and their citation counts, including citations from abroad. This allows them to examine both the quantity and quality of local inventions. They also refine their data on local academic R&​D to explore effects from different fields of science and sources of R&​D funding. Finally, they incorporate data on congressional earmarks of funds for academic R&​D. ; With one important exception, results using citation-weighted patents are similar to those using unweighted patents. For example, estimates of the returns to density (jobs per square mile) are only slightly changed when using citation-weighted patents as the dependent variable. But estimates of returns to city size (urbanization effects) are quite sensitive to the choice of dependent variable. ; Local human capital is the most important determinant of per capita rates of patenting. A 1 percent increase in the adult population with a college degree increases the local patenting rate by about 1 percent. ; With few exceptions, there is little variation across fields of science in the contribution of academic R&​D to patenting rates. The exceptions are computer and life sciences, where the effects are smaller. There is greater variation in the contribution of R&​D funded by different sources-academic R&​D funded by the federal government generates smaller increases in patenting rates than R&​D funded by the university itself. This effect is somewhat stronger for federally funded applied R&​D than for basic R&​D. The authors also find small negative effects for cities with greater exposure to academic R&​D allocated by congressional earmarks. ; They discuss the implications of these results for policy and future research.
  • RePEc:fip:fedpwp:09-12
Language
  • English
Contributed by
OAIster

Get this edition

Other links

  • Set up My libraries

    How do I set up "My libraries"?

    In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen.

  • All (1)
  • Unknown (1)
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment