2003, English, Article, Report edition: The importance of women's status for child nutrition in developing countries / Lisa C. Smith ... [et al.].

User activity

Share to:
The importance of women's status for child nutrition in developing countries / Lisa C. Smith ... [et al.]
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/35374328
Physical Description
  • xii, 164 p. : ill. ; 28 cm.
Published
  • Washington, D.C. : International Food Policy Research Institute ; [Atlanta, Ga.] : Dept. of International Health, Emory University, 2003.
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • The importance of women's status for child nutrition in developing countries /​ Lisa C. Smith ... [et al.].
Other Authors
  • Smith, Lisa C.
Published
  • Washington, D.C. : International Food Policy Research Institute ; [Atlanta, Ga.] : Dept. of International Health, Emory University, 2003.
Physical Description
  • xii, 164 p. : ill. ; 28 cm.
Series
Subjects
Contents
  • Machine derived contents note: Contents
  • List of Tables ii
  • List of Figures vi
  • Foreword
  • Acknowledgments ix
  • Summary x
  • 1. Introduction 1
  • 2. Conceptual Framework 7
  • 3. Data, Measures, and Methods 27
  • 4. Results: Women's Status and Child Nutrition 57
  • 5. Results: Women's Status,Women's Nutritional Status, and Care for Women 75
  • 6. Results: Women's Status and Care for Children 84
  • 7. The Asian Enigma 100
  • 8. Conclusions and Policy Implications 110
  • Appendix A: Model of Household Decisionmaking 134
  • Appendix B: Validation of Measure of Women's Relative Decisionmaking Power 149
  • Appendix C: Creation of Measure of Household Economic Status 157
  • References 164
  • List of Tables
  • 1.1 Prevalence and number of underweight children under five years, 1995 181
  • 1.2 Comparison of progress made by South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa in some
  • determinants of child nutritional status 182
  • 1.3 Inequalities between women and men and women's health, 1990s 183
  • 3.1 Description of data sets employed and study sample sizes 184
  • 3.2 Dependent variables of the study 185
  • 3.3 Means of indicators of women's decisionmaking power relative to men's, by
  • region and country 186
  • 3.4 Correlation matrix for indicators of women's relative decisionmaking
  • power 187
  • 3.5 Index of women's relative decisionmaking power: Factor analysis output 188
  • 3.6 Means of indicators of societal gender equality, by country and region 189
  • 3.7 Correlation matrix for indicators of societal gender equality 190
  • 3.8 Index of societal gender equality: Factor analysis output 191
  • 3.9 Independent variables of the study (socioeconomic determinants) 192
  • 4.1 Child nutritional status, by region and country (Z-scores) 193
  • 4.2 Women's status, by region and country 194
  • 4.3 Effect of women's status on child weight-for-age Z-scores: Global
  • model (OLS regression) 195
  • 4.4 Effect of women's status on child weight-for-age Z-scores: Regression
  • results, by region (OLS regression) 196
  • 4.5 Effect of women's status on child height-for-age Z-scores: Regression
  • results, by region (OLS regression) 198
  • 4.6 Effect of women's status on child weight-for-height Z-scores: Regression
  • results, by region (OLS regression) 200
  • 4.7 Effect of women's status on stunting, wasting, and underweight of children
  • (logistic regression, summary of results) 202
  • 4.8 Means of women's status indexes across economic status groups 203
  • 4.9 Effect of women's status on child nutritional status, by economic status
  • group 204
  • 5.1 Women's body mass index, by region (nonpregnant women) 205
  • 5.2 Effect of women's status on their body mass index: Regression results, by region
  • (OLS regression) 206
  • 5.3 Effect of women's status on their nutritional status: underweight and overweight
  • (Logistic regression, summary of results) 208
  • 5.4 Prenatal and birthing care, by region 209
  • 5.5 Effect of women's status on whether woman received any prenatal care:
  • Regression results, by region (logistic regression) 210
  • 5.6 Effect of women's status on whether a woman who received prenatal care
  • had at least three visits: Regression results, by region (logistic regression) 212
  • 5.7 Effect of women's status on number of months before birth of woman's
  • first prenatal visit: Regression results, by region (OLS regression) 214
  • 5.8 Effect of women's status on whether woman gives birth in a medical
  • facility: Regression results, by region (logistic regression) 216
  • 5.9 Effect of women's status on prenatal and birthing care: Summary of
  • results (OLS or logistic regression) 218
  • 6.1 Child feeding practices, by region 219
  • 6.2 Effect of women's status on whether breastfeeding is initiated within one day
  • of birth: Regression results, by region (logistic regression) 220
  • 6.3 Effect of women's status on whether child 0-4 months is exclusively breastfed:
  • Regression results, by region (logistic regression) 222
  • 6.4 Effect of women's status on whether child 0-4 months receives nothing from a
  • bottle: Regression results, by region (logistic regression) 224
  • 6.5 Effect of women's status on number of months of breastfeeding:
  • Regression results, by region (OLS regression) 226
  • 6.6 Effect of women's status on whether child 6-12 months receives
  • complementary foods: Regression results, by region (logistic regression) 228
  • 6.7 Effect of women's status on whether child more than 6 months receives high
  • quality food: Regression results, by region (logistic regression) 230
  • 6.8 Effect of women's status on number of times per day child more than 6 months
  • eats: Regression results, by region (OLS regression) 232
  • 6.9 Effect of women's status on breastfeeding and complementary feeding:
  • Summary of results (OLS or logistic regression) 234
  • 6.10 Health and health-seeking practices, by region 235
  • 6.11 Effect of women's status on whether child diarrhea is treated: Regression
  • results, by region (logistic regression) 236
  • 6.12 Effect of women's status on whether child has ever been vaccinated :
  • Regression results, by region (logistic regression) 238
  • 6.13 Effect of women's status on whether child has received recommended
  • immunizations: Regression results, by region (logistic regression) 240
  • 6.14 Effect of women's status on health-seeking practices: Summary of results (logistic
  • regression) 242
  • 6.15 Effect of women's status on whether child has an adult caretaker while
  • mother is working: Regression results, by region (logistic regression) 243
  • 7.1 Comparison of levels of and effects on child nutritional status of
  • women's status and other behavioral determinants: South Asia and Sub-
  • Saharan Africa 245
  • 7.2 Determinants of child weight-for-age Z-scores: South Asia and Sub-Saharan
  • Africa model (OLS regression) 246
  • 7.3 Comparison of proximal determinants of child nutritional status: South
  • Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa 247
  • 8.1 Examples of public policy to improve women's status 248
  • B.1 Description of validation variables used in validation analysis of the
  • measure of women's relative decisionmaking power 249
  • B.2 Validation of indicators of women's decisionmaking power relative to men's:
  • Descriptive results 250
  • B.3 Validation of indicators of women's decisionmaking power relative to men's:
  • Probit regression results (marginal effects) 251
  • C.1 Availability of asset ownership data in DHS data sets 252
  • C.2 Percent of households falling into economic status groups, by country
  • and region 254
  • List of Figures
  • 2.1 Causes of child malnutrition 255
  • 2.2 Women's status and care for children and children's birth weights 256
  • 3.1 Distribution of index of women's relative decisionmaking power 257
  • 3.2 Distribution of index of societal gender equality 258
  • 4.1 Percentage of stunted, wasted, and underweight children, by region 259
  • 4.2 Women's status indexes, by region 260
  • 4.3 Predicted child nutritional status Z-scores, by indexes of women's status 261
  • 4.4 Predicted child malnutrition, by indexes of women's status 262
  • 4.5 Effect of women's relative decisionmaking power on child weight-for-age Z-
  • scores, South Asian countries 263
  • 4.6 Effect of women's relative decisionmaking power on child weight-for-age
  • Z-scores, Sub-Saharan African countries 264
  • 4.7 Effect of women's relative decisionmaking power
  • on child weight-for-age Z-scores, Latin America and the Caribbean countries 265
  • 4.8 Effect of societal gender equality on child weight-for-age Z-scores, South Asian
  • countries 266
  • 4.9 Effect of societal gender equality on child weight-for-age Z-scores, Sub-Saharan
  • African countries 267
  • 4.10 Effect of societal gender equality on child weight-for-age Z-scores, Latin America
  • and the Caribbean countries 268
  • 5.1Percentage of nonpregnant women with low and high body mass index (BMI) 269
  • 5.2 Predicted women's body mass index, by indexes of women's status 270
  • 5.3 Predicted probability of a woman's being malnourished, by indexes of
  • women's status 271
  • 5.4 Percentage of women who receive any prenatal care and who give birth in a
  • medical facility 272
  • 5.5 Predicted prenatal care variables, by indexes of women's status 273
  • 5.6 Predicted probability of women giving birth in a medical facility, by
  • indexes of women's status 274
  • 6.1 Predicted breastfeeding variables, by indexes of women's status 275
  • 6.2 Predicted complementary feeding variables, by indexes of women's status 277
  • 6.3 Predicted health-seeking variables, by indexes of women's status 278
  • 6.4 Type of caregiver while woman is working (%) 279
  • 6.5 Predicted probability of child having an adult caretaker while mother is
  • working, by women's status
  • 7.1 Contribution of levels difference in women's status to the child nutritional status
  • gap between South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa: A graphical illustration
  • 7.2 Contribution of effect difference in women's status to the child nutritional status
  • B.1 Predicted probability of a woman having "high" status, by indicators of
  • women's relative decisionmaking power 282
  • B.2 Predicted probability of a woman having "high" status, by index of woman's
  • relative decisionmaking power
  • C.1 Creation of economic status groups: Destitute, poor, middle, and rich 253.
Notes
  • Includes bibliographical references (p. 157-164)
Language
  • English
ISBN
  • 0896291340 (alk. paper)
Dewey Number
  • 363.8/​1/​091724
Libraries Australia ID
Contributed by
Libraries Australia

Get this edition

Freely available

Related resource

None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment