Lawyers' decisions in Australian patent dispute settlements : an empirical perspective / Chris Dent and Kimberlee Weatherall Dent, Chris

User activity

Send to:
View the summary of this work
Author
Dent, Chris
Appears In
Australian Intellectual Property Journal
Subjects
Patent suits - research - Australia.; Patent practice - Australia.; Cultural property - Protection - Law and legislation - New Zealand.
Summary
The opposition procedure in Australian patent law is an effective tool for improving the quality of granted patents. The current, pre-grant, process is, however, open to abuse by opponents who merely wish to delay the grant of a patent. Received wisdom has it that a post-grant procedure would be contrary to the Australian Constitution - that is, for a delegate of the Comissioner of Patents to decide to an opposition post-grant would be an improper exercise of judicial power. The paper details the various tests for judicial power to assess the truth of this wisdom. The conslusion, after a review of the High Court precedents and commentary, is that a post-grant opposition procedure, assuming it is substantially similar to the current pre-grant process, would not offend the Constitution.
Bookmark
http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/5538384
Work ID
5538384

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this work

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this work

Add a comment


Show comments and reviews from Amazon users