User activity

Share to:
View the summary of this work
Zha, Yong ; Liang, Liang
Appears In
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making
Computers; Analysis
To access, purchase, authenticate, or subscribe to the full-text of this article, please visit this link: Byline: Yong Zha, Liang Liang DEA and ratio analysis are commonly viewed as alternatively effective tools in assessing the performance of different DMUs. Many researches have been developed to reveal their inherent relationship and to explore the integration of both methods as well. In this paper, we first question TheoremA 1 by Wu etA al. (International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 4(3) (2005) 369--384) and illustrate a counter example to show the nonequivalence between the aggregated ratio model they proposed and CCR model. The errors which existed in its proof are also indicated. Further, an improved aggregated ratio model is established to better comprehend the inner relationship between the two methods. We demonstrate its equivalence to traditional CCR model, and propose an inference that the observed DMU is ratio efficient if and only if it is CCR efficient. Numerical analysis carefully describes the nontrivial difference between the proposed model and that by Wu etA al. (International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 4(3) (2005) 369--384), and validates the feasibility of our model.
Work ID

2 editions of this work

Find a specific edition
Thumbnail [View as table] [View as grid] Title, Author, Edition Date Language Format Libraries

User activity

e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this work

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this work

Add a comment

Show comments and reviews from Amazon users