2005, 2003, 2000, English, Photograph edition: Towards ethical guidelines for dealing with unsolicited patient emails and giving teleadvice in the absence of a pre-existing patient-physician relationship — systematic review and expert survey Eysenbach, Gunther

User activity

Send to:
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/38173754
Physical Description
  • 79213 bytes, 115074 bytes, 40812 bytes, 19258 bytes, 45872 bytes, 125 bytes, 6817 bytes, text/​html, text/​xml, image/​jpeg, image/​gif, application/​octet-stream
Published
  • Gunther Eysenbach; Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Toronto, Canada
  • 2005-12-22T18:34:04Z
  • 2003
  • 2000-02-24
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • Towards ethical guidelines for dealing with unsolicited patient emails and giving teleadvice in the absence of a pre-existing patient-physician relationship — systematic review and expert survey
Creator
  • Eysenbach, Gunther
Published
  • Gunther Eysenbach; Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Toronto, Canada
  • 2005-12-22T18:34:04Z
  • 2003
  • 2000-02-24
Physical Description
  • 79213 bytes, 115074 bytes, 40812 bytes, 19258 bytes, 45872 bytes, 125 bytes, 6817 bytes, text/​html, text/​xml, image/​jpeg, image/​gif, application/​octet-stream
Subjects
Notes
  • [This item is a preserved copy and is not necessarily the most recent version. To view the current item, visit http:/​/​www.jmir.org/​2000/​1/​e1/​ ] Background: Many health information providers on the Internet and doctors with email accounts are confronted with the phenomenon of receiving unsolicited emails from patients asking for medical advice. Also, a growing number of websites offer "ask-the-doctor" services, where patients can ask questions to health professionals via email or other means of telecommunication. It is unclear whether these types of interactions constitute medical practice, and whether physicians have the ethical obligation to respond to unsolicited patient emails. Objective: To improve the quality of online communication between patients and health professionals (physicians, experts) in the absence of a pre-existing patient-physician relationship or face-to-face communication, by preparing a set of guiding ethical principles applicable to this kind of interaction. Methods: Systematic review of the literature, professional, and ethical codes; and consultation with experts. Results: Two different types of patient-physician encounters have to be distinguished. "Traditional" clinical encounters or telemedicine applications are called "Type B" interactions here (Bona fide relationship). In comparison, online interactions lack many of the characteristics of bona fide interactions; most notably there is no pre-existing relationship and the information available to the physician is limited if, for example, a physician responds to the email of a patient who he has never seen before. I call these "Type A" consultations (Absence of pre-existing patient-physician relationship). While guidelines for Type B interactions on the Internet exist (Kane, 1998), this is not the case for Type A interactions. The following principles are suggested: Physicians responding to patients' requests on the Internet should act within the limitations of telecommunication services and keep the global nature of the Internet in mind; not every aspect of medicine requires face-to-face communication; requests for help, including unsolicited patient questions, should not be ignored, but dealt with in some appropriate manner; informed consent requires fair and honest labeling; health professionals and information providers must maintain confidentiality; health professionals should define internal procedures and perform quality control measures. Conclusions: Different media are appropriate at each point on the continuum between dispensing general health information and handling patient problems that would require the practice of medicine to solve. For example, email is a sufficiently capable medium for giving out general health information, while diagnosis and treatment usually requires at least advanced telemedical technology. Patients have to be educated that it is unethical to diagnose and treat over the Internet in the absence of a pre-existing patient-physician relationship, and if the interaction is limited to a single email. More research is needed to establish more evidence regarding situations in which teleadvice is beneficial and efficient.
  • Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Responses to unsolicited patient e-mail requests for medical advice on the World Wide Web. JAMA Oct 21, 1998. Vol. 280(15) p. 1333-5.
  • Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Patients looking for information on the Internet and seeking teleadvice: motivation, expectations, and misconceptions as expressed in e-mails sent to physicians. Arch Dermatol Feb 1999. Vol. 135(2) p. 151-6.
  • Mandl KD, Kohane IS, Brandt AM. Electronic patient-physician communication: problems and promise [review]. Ann Intern Med Sep 15, 1998. Vol. 129(6) p. 495-500.
  • Roemer L. Doctor, you've got E-mail [letter]. JAMA Aug 25, 1999. Vol. 282(8) p. 729-730.
  • Kane B, Sands D Z. Guidelines for the clinical use of electronic mail with patients. The AMIA Internet Working Group, Task Force on Guidelines for the Use of Clinic-Patient Electronic Mail. J Am Med Inform Assoc Feb 1998. Vol. 5(1) p. 104-11.
  • Ferguson T. Digital doctoring--opportunities and challenges in electronic patient-physician communication [editorial]. JAMA Oct 21, 1998. Vol. 280(15) p. 1361-2.
  • Borowitz SM, Wyatt JC. The origin, content, and workload of e-mail consultations. JAMA Oct 21, 1998. Vol. 280(15) p. 1321-4.
  • Spielberg AR. On call and online: sociohistorical, legal, and ethical implications of e-mail for the patient-physician relationship. JAMA Oct 21, 1998. Vol. 280(15) p. 1353-9.
  • Widman LE, Tong DA. Requests for medical advice from patients and families to health care providers who publish on the World Wide Web. Arch Intern Med Jan 27, 1997. Vol. 157(2) p. 209-12.
  • Culver J D, Gerr F, Frumkin H. Medical information on the Internet: a study of an electronic bulletin board. J Gen Intern Med Aug 1997. Vol. 12(8) p. 466-70.
  • Eysenbach G, Diepgen T L. Evaluation of cyberdocs. Lancet Nov 7, 1998. Vol. 352(9139) p. 1526.
  • Sandvik H. Health information and interaction on the internet: a survey of female urinary incontinence. BMJ Jul 3, 1999. Vol. 319(7201) p. 29-32. URL: http:/​/​bmj.com/​cgi/​pmidlookup?view=​long&​pmid=​10390457
  • Richards Edward P, Rathbun Katharine C. Law and the Physician: A Practical Guide Little Brown &​ Co; Boston(MA). Jan 1, 1993.
  • Neill R. Doctor, you've got E-mail [letter]. JAMA Aug 25, 1999. Vol. 282(8) p. 730-1.
  • Howard M L. E-mail: effective if handled with care. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Apr 1999. Vol. 125(4) p. 471.
  • Standing Committee of European Doctors (CP). Ethical guidelines in telemedicine. URL: http:/​/​www.utu.fi/​research/​mircit/​ethics.html [accessed 1999 Dec 4]
  • Wolfram Scharenberg. Keller G, editors. Spokesman of the Hamburg State Chamber of Physicians. Kurpfusch Online. Online Today 1999. Vol. 3 p. 75.
  • FMH. Standesordnung FMH. SÄZ 1998. (79) p. 2118-2134.
  • Boyer C, Selby M, Scherrer J R, Appel R D. The Health On the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Websites. Comput Biol Med Sep 1998. Vol. 28(5) p. 603-10.
  • American Medical Association. AMA Current Opinions of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs; E-5.025. Physician Advisory or Referral Services by Telecommunications. Accessed using PolicyFinder Version A-98 American Medical Association; Chicago(IL). Oct 28, 1998. URL: http:/​/​www.ama-assn.org/​meetings/​public/​int1998/​reports/​reports.htm
  • Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Doctor, you've got E-mail [letter reply]. JAMA Aug 25, 1999. Vol. 282(8) p. 729-730.
  • Sims S, Golightly PW. Partnership with patients. Telephone helpline services can meet patients' demand for information [letter]. BMJ Aug 8, 1998. Vol. 317(7155) p. 414.
  • Huntley A C. The need to know: patients, e-mail, and the Internet. Arch Dermatol Feb 1999. Vol. 135(2) p. 198-9.
  • Lewis AD. Patients, physicians, and e-mail [letter]. Arch Dermatol Jan 2000. Vol. 136(1) p. 121-2.
  • Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Patients, physicians, and e-mail [letter reply]. Arch Dermatol Jan 2000. Vol. 136(1) p. 121-2.
  • Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information [review]. BMJ Nov 28, 1998. Vol. 317(7171) p. 1496-500.
  • Reents S, Miller TE. The Health Care Industry in Transition - The Online Mandate To Change. Cyber Dialogue 1998. URL: http:/​/​www.cyberdialogue.com/​free_data/​white_papers/​intel_health_day.html [accessed 1998]
  • doi:10.2196/​jmir.2.1.e1
  • Gunther Eysenbach. Towards ethical guidelines for dealing with unsolicited patient emails and giving teleadvice in the absence of a pre-existing patient-physician relationship — systematic review and expert survey. J Med Internet Res 2000;2(1):e1 <URL: http:/​/​www.jmir.org/​2000/​1/​e1/​>
  • 1438-8871
Terms of Use
Language
  • English
Contributed by
OAIster

Get this edition

  • Set up My libraries

    How do I set up "My libraries"?

    In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen.

  • All (1)
  • Unknown (1)
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment