English, Article edition: First-movers, non-movers, and social gains from subsidising entry in markets for nature-based recreational goods Vedel, Suzanne Elizabeth; Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark; Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl

User activity

Share to:
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/32011
Physical Description
  • article
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • First-movers, non-movers, and social gains from subsidising entry in markets for nature-based recreational goods
Author
  • Vedel, Suzanne Elizabeth
  • Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark
  • Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl
Physical Description
  • article
Notes
  • The importance of ecosystem services for mankind stresses the issue of identifying different institutional solutions to effectively secure their adequate provision. Much focus has been on services of the public good type, and instruments like payments for environmental services. We extend this work to consider the possible social gains from supporting development of new markets for nature-based recreational goods, which may alleviate negative externalities caused by congestion problems. Our three main questions are: i) Why is there a lack of market development? ii) Can there be social gains from intervention and supporting the development of such markets? And iii) if so, then how could such intervention be best performed? We use a two-stage non-cooperative Bayesian simultaneous-move game model and show that in spite of apparent potential first-mover advantages in a developing market, demand uncertainty and sunk costs may equally well result in widespread presence of non-movers on the supplier side. We show that social gains can be made from offering a subsidy towards the sunk costs. Analysing three possible subsidy schemes, we show a) that fixed costs may make rationing optimal, b) that sequential rationing does not necessarily dominate strict rationing because c) the more subsidies are offered, the larger each subsidy must be to induce participation, and that d) the longer a single agent on the market may keep market information to himself, the better a non-rationing scheme will perform relative to rationing schemes. Finally, e) subsidies for second-mover entry may be optimal in some cases.
  • Sunk costs Fixed supply Public procurement Rationing Payment for environmental services Ecosystem services
  • RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:68:y:2009:i:8-9:p:2363-2371
Language
  • English
Contributed by
OAIster

Get this edition

Other links

  • Set up My libraries

    How do I set up "My libraries"?

    In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen.

  • All (1)
  • Unknown (1)
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment