English, Article edition: Democratic development: a comprehensive concept of comparative assessment Jennifer S. Holmes; Sheila Amin Gutiérrez de Piñeres

User activity

Share to:
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/29872
Physical Description
  • article
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • Democratic development: a comprehensive concept of comparative assessment
Author
  • Jennifer S. Holmes
  • Sheila Amin Gutiérrez de Piñeres
Physical Description
  • article
Notes
  • Purpose – Existing attempts to assess national development and processes of democratization suffer from conceptual and measurement challenges. This paper proposes a comprehensive concept of democratic development and develops a more inclusive concept of democracy to provide a common set of categories to evaluate its depth and quality. Design/​methodology/​approach – In order to measure the depth and health of democracy, democratic development incorporates four categories of human progress, each measured by multiple variables. The four categories deemed important for human progress are general development, democratic health, democratic inclusiveness, and human capital. Components of democratic development incorporate existing measures of political and economic development to create a comprehensive and accessible measure of democratic development. Findings – The comparative tables based on multiple goals of development clearly reveal that neither the GDP index nor the HDI are adequate measures of development. Democratic development can be more fully captured by four perspectives: development, democratic inclusiveness, democratic health, and human capital, providing a framework to measure progress in reform, democracy, and development, from public agencies up to the national level. This concept incorporates aspects and orientations of the capabilities approach to create a concept that is amenable to use as a self-assessment tool and as a basis for comparison of development, broadly conceived. Practical implications – This inclusive concept is particularly well suited for analyzing citizen satisfaction and democratic stability. Originality/​value – Rather than focusing on singular measures, the approach presented here offers a balanced set of measures aimed at providing a comprehensive view of the gamut of democratic and economic development processes relative to existing models that is more appropriate for self-assessment/​planning purposes than traditional measures, which may be more appropriate for statistical modeling purposes.
  • Comparative tests, Democracy, Political science
  • RePEc:eme:ijsepp:v:33:y:2006:i:1:p:54-76
Language
  • English
Contributed by
OAIster

Get this edition

  • Set up My libraries

    How do I set up "My libraries"?

    In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen.

  • All (1)
  • Unknown (1)
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment