2007, English, Article, Working paper edition: Get a GRIP : should area revenue coverage be offered through the farm bill or as a crop insurance program? / Nicholas Paulson and Bruce A. Babcock. Paulson, Nick D.

User activity

Share to:
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/9744764
Physical Description
  • 29 p. : col. ill. ; 28 cm.
Published
  • Ames, Iowa : Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, [2007]
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • Get a GRIP : should area revenue coverage be offered through the farm bill or as a crop insurance program? /​ Nicholas Paulson and Bruce A. Babcock.
Also Titled
  • Should area revenue coverage be offered through the farm bill or as a crop insurance program?
  • Get a Group Risk Income Protection
Author
  • Paulson, Nick D.
Other Authors
  • Babcock, Bruce A. (Bruce Alan)
  • Iowa State University. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development
Published
  • Ames, Iowa : Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, [2007]
Physical Description
  • 29 p. : col. ill. ; 28 cm.
Series
Subjects
Summary
  • The successful expansion of the U.S. crop insurance program has not eliminated ad hoc disaster assistance. An alternative currently being explored by members of Congress and others in preparation of the 2007 farm bill is to simply remove the "ad hoc" part of disaster assistance programs by creating a standing program that would automatically funnel aid to hard-hit regions and crops. One form such a program could take can be found in the area yield and area revenue insurance programs currently offered by the U.S. crop insurance program. The Group Risk Plan (GRP) and Group Risk Income Protection (GRIP) programs automatically trigger payments when county yields or revenues, respectively, fall below a producer-elected coverage level. The per-acre taxpayer costs of offering GRIP in Indiana, Illinois, and Iowa for corn and soybeans through the crop insurance program are estimated. These results are used to determine the amount of area revenue coverage that could be offered to farmers as part of a standing farm bill disaster program. Approximately 55% of taxpayer support for GRIP flows to the crop insurance industry. A significant portion of this support comes in the form of net underwriting gains. The expected rate of return on money put at risk by private crop insurance companies under the current Standard Reinsurance Agreement is approximately 100%.Taking this industry support and adding in the taxpayer support for GRIP that flows to producers would fund a county target revenue program at the 93% coverage level.
Notes
  • "January 2007."
  • Includes bibliographical references (p. 28-29)
  • Also available via the World Wide Web.
Language
  • English
Libraries Australia ID
Contributed by
Libraries Australia

Get this edition

Other links

None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment