English, Article edition: Utility Assessment in Patients with Mental Disorders: Validity and Discriminative Ability of the Time Trade-Off Method Hans-Helmut Knig; Oliver H. Gnther; Matthias C. Angermeyer; ...

User activity

Share to:
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/26043
Physical Description
  • article
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • Utility Assessment in Patients with Mental Disorders: Validity and Discriminative Ability of the Time Trade-Off Method
Author
  • Hans-Helmut Knig
  • Oliver H. Gnther
  • Matthias C. Angermeyer
  • Christiane Roick
Physical Description
  • article
Notes
  • BackgroundBackground Preference-based health-state values, also referred to as utility scores, are considered an important measure of outcome in the evaluation of healthcare. A common approach to elicit utility scores is the use of the time trade-off (TTO) method; however, the data on TTO utility scores in patients with mental disorders are scarce. Abstract: ObjectiveObjective To analyse the TTO method in patients with mental disorders in terms of discriminative ability, validity and the refusal to trade life time (zero trade). Abstract: MethodsMethods In patients with affective (n - 172), schizophrenia spectrum (n - 166) and alcohol-related (n - 160) mental disorders, TTO utilities were administered through a standardized interview. Measures of quality of life (QOL) EQ-5D, WHOQOL-BREF, subjective (SCL-90R) and objective (CGI-S) psychopathology, and functioning (GAF, GARF, SOFAS, HoNOS) provided comparison. Discriminative ability was analysed by assessing frequency distributions of TTO utilities. Validity was analysed by assessing the correlation of TTO utilities with all other scores. The association of a patient's QOL, sociodemographic and disease-related variables with zero trade was analysed by logistic regression. Abstract: ResultsResults Of patients with affective/​schizophrenic/​alcohol-related mental disorders, 153/​143/​145 (89/​86/​91%), respectively, completed the TTO elicitation; 29/​43/​28% of the respondents were zero traders. The mean TTO utility was 0.66/​0.75/​0.61 and the median was 0.85/​0.95/​0.75. TTO utility scores discriminated well among more impaired mental health states, but discrimination was limited among less impaired health states. In patients with affective and alcohol-related mental disorders, TTO utility scores were significantly correlated (mostly moderate: 0.3 < r < 0.5) with all other scores. However, in schizophrenic patients, TTO utility scores were only a little correlated with other subjective measures and not correlated with objective measures. QOL was significantly associated with zero trade; the influence of the other variables on zero trade was negligible. Abstract: ConclusionsConclusions TTO utility scores in patients with affective or alcohol-related mental disorders were reasonably valid, but discriminative ability was compromised by a ceiling effect due to zero trade. In schizophrenic patients, validity of TTO utility scores was not demonstrated.
  • RePEc:wkh:phecon:v:27:y:2009:i:5:p:405-419
Language
  • English
Contributed by
OAIster

Get this edition

  • Set up My libraries

    How do I set up "My libraries"?

    In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen.

  • All (1)
  • Unknown (1)
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment