2009, English, Article edition: A model-based performance test for forest classifiers on remote-sensing imagery Couturier, Stéphane; Gastellu-Etchegorry, Jean-Philippe; Patino, P.; ...

User activity

Share to:
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/209063
Physical Description
  • text
Published
  • HAL - CCSD
  • 2009
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • A model-based performance test for forest classifiers on remote-sensing imagery
Author
  • Couturier, Stéphane
  • Gastellu-Etchegorry, Jean-Philippe
  • Patino, P.
  • Martin, Emmanuel
Published
  • HAL - CCSD
  • 2009
Physical Description
  • text
Subjects
Notes
  • Ambiguity between forest types on remote-sensing imagery is a major cause of errors found in accuracy assessments of forest inventorymaps. This paper presents a methodology, based on forest plot inventory, ground measurements and simulated imagery, for systematically quantifying these ambiguities in the sense of the minimum distance (MD), maximum likelihood (ML), and frequency-based (FB) classifiers. The method is tested with multi-spectral IKONOS images acquired on areas containing six major communities (oak, pine, fir, primary and secondary high tropical forests, and avocado plantation) of the National Forest Inventory (NFI) map in Mexico. A structural record of the canopy and optical measurements (leaf area index and soil reflectance) were performed on one plot of each class. Intra-class signal variation was modelled using the Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART) simulator of remote-sensing images. Atmospheric conditions were inferred from ground measurements on reference surfaces and leaf optical properties of each forest type were derived from the IKONOS forest signal. Next, all forest types were simulated, using a common environmental configuration, in order to quantify similarity among all forest types, according to MD, ML and FB classifiers. Classes were considered ambiguous when their dissimilarity was smaller than intra-class signal variation. DART proved useful in approximating the pixel value distribution and the ambiguity pattern measured on real forest imagery. In the case study, the oak forest and the secondary tropical forest were both distinguishable from all other classes using an MD classifier in a 25 m window size, whereas pine and primary tropical forests were ambiguous with three other classes using MD. By contrast, only two pairs of classes were found ambiguous for the ML classifier and only one for the FB classifier in that same window size. The avocado plantation was confounded with the primary tropical forest for all classifiers, presumably because the reflectance of both types of forest is governed by a deep canopy and a similar shadow area. We confronted the results of this study with the confusion matrix from the accuracy assessment of the NFI map. An asset of this model-basedmethod is its applicability to a variety of sensor types, eco-zones and class definitions.
  • HAL:ird-00405490, version 1
  • HAL:http:/​/​hal.ird.fr/​ird-00405490/​en/​
  • DOI:10.1016/​j.foreco.2008.08.017
Language
  • English
Contributed by
OAIster

Get this edition

  • Set up My libraries

    How do I set up "My libraries"?

    In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen.

  • All (1)
  • Unknown (1)
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment