2009, English, Article edition: Testing Cold Protection According to EN ISO 20344: Is There Any Professional Footwear that Does Not Pass? Kuklane, Kalev; Ueno, Satoru; Sawada, Shin-Ichi; ...

User activity

Share to:
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/207873
Physical Description
  • text/​html
Published
  • Oxford University Press
  • 2009-01-01 00:00:00.0
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • Testing Cold Protection According to EN ISO 20344: Is There Any Professional Footwear that Does Not Pass?
Author
  • Kuklane, Kalev
  • Ueno, Satoru
  • Sawada, Shin-Ichi
  • Holmér, Ingvar
Published
  • Oxford University Press
  • 2009-01-01 00:00:00.0
Physical Description
  • text/​html
Subjects
Notes
  • The present Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards for safety, protective and occupational footwear EN ISO 20344–20347 classify footwear as cold protective by a pass/​fail test where the limits are set for an allowed 10°C temperature drop inside the footwear during 30 min at a temperature gradient of ∼40°C. It is questionable if a simple pass/​fail test of this kind provides approved footwear that really protects the feet from cooling in exposures ranging from temperatures at +18°C to as low as or even lower than −50°C. This study selected for testing some professional footwear that could certainly not be considered as cold protective. Some footwear that could be used in cold was selected with as low insulation as the not cold-intended footwear. Also, a boot intended for cold was selected to be tested according to a modified standard at a temperature gradient of 70°C. The footwear selection was based on insulation measurements with a thermal foot model. All footwear did pass the test. Although it is clear for the user that a sandal, a mesh shoe or a thin textile shoe is not cold protective, it is not as clear that an item of safety footwear, that has as low insulation as those mentioned above, could be classified as cold protective according to the present standards. Because of this, the user might have a deceptive feeling of safety and may be exposed to higher risks. As practically all professional footwear may pass this cold test, then the method/​requirements should be radically changed or such a test should be removed from the standards.
Terms of Use
  • Copyright (C) 2009, British Occupational Hygiene Society
Language
  • English
Contributed by
OAIster

Get this edition

With access conditions

  • Set up My libraries

    How do I set up "My libraries"?

    In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen.

  • All (1)
  • Unknown (1)
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment