2009, English, Article edition: Application of PUF Foam Inserts for Respirable Dust Measurements in the Brick-Manufacturing Industry De Vocht, Frank; Hirst, Adrian; Gardner, Anthony

User activity

Share to:
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/207836
Physical Description
  • text/​html
Published
  • Oxford University Press
  • 2009-01-01 00:00:00.0
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • Application of PUF Foam Inserts for Respirable Dust Measurements in the Brick-Manufacturing Industry
Author
  • De Vocht, Frank
  • Hirst, Adrian
  • Gardner, Anthony
Published
  • Oxford University Press
  • 2009-01-01 00:00:00.0
Physical Description
  • text/​html
Subjects
Notes
  • Institute of Occupational Medicine dual-fraction samplers equipped with porous polyurethane foam inserts have been introduced as a cheaper alternative to cyclone pre-selectors for measuring respirable dust. Initial data from a variety of industries suggested that the dual-fraction sampler yielded similar results as personal cyclones and that the respirable selection of the foam was not adversely affected by particle loading. We conducted a similar study, but specifically in the brick industry to assess the validity of this dual-fraction sampler as an alternative to personal cyclones in this industry. A total of 72 side-by-side samples using Higgins–Dewell cyclones and dual-fraction samplers were taken in seven UK factories manufacturing a variety of bricks. A priori measurements were assigned to any of the three groups based on the dominant source of the particulates in the exposure matrix (clay, sand or mixed) at the location in the factories where the measurements were taken. After log transformation, Higgins–Dewell cyclone-measured concentrations were on average 1.9 times higher than the concentrations measured by the dual-fraction samplers, with a Pearson correlation of 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.66–0.85). Stratified analysis by main source of exposure suggested that the correlation was best for silica dust-based exposures r p =​ 0.88 (0.63–0.96), but decreased with the relative importance of clay particulates in the exposure matrix to r p =​ 0.82 (0.59–0.93) in the ‘mixed-source’ group and r p =​ 0.74 (0.55–0.85) in the ‘clay particulates’ group. Similarly, performance of the dual-fraction sampler relative to the cyclone sampler was negatively associated with increased relative importance of clay particulates in the exposure matrix and ranged from similar measured concentration β =​ 0.96 (0.54–1.39) for silica to 50% under sampling β =​ 0.50 (0.33–0.67) for clay particulates. These results suggested that the overall performance of the dual-fraction sampler in the brick industry depends on the relative importance of clay particulates in the exposure matrix. As such, results from occupational hygiene compliance surveys close to the occupational exposure limit can lead to erroneous decisions on compliance.
Terms of Use
  • Copyright (C) 2009, British Occupational Hygiene Society
Language
  • English
Contributed by
OAIster

Get this edition

With access conditions

  • Set up My libraries

    How do I set up "My libraries"?

    In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen.

  • All (1)
  • Unknown (1)
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment