1998, English, Article edition: Transfer of frozen-thawed embryos in artificially prepared cycles with and without prior gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist suppression: a prospective randomized study Simon, Alex; Hurwitz, Arye; Zentner, Bat-Sheva; ...

User activity

Share to:
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/205540
Physical Description
  • text/​html
Published
  • Oxford University Press
  • 1998-10-01 00:00:00.0
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • Transfer of frozen-thawed embryos in artificially prepared cycles with and without prior gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist suppression: a prospective randomized study
Author
  • Simon, Alex
  • Hurwitz, Arye
  • Zentner, Bat-Sheva
  • Bdolah, Yuval
  • Laufer, Neri
Published
  • Oxford University Press
  • 1998-10-01 00:00:00.0
Physical Description
  • text/​html
Subjects
Notes
  • Transfer of frozen–thawed embryos is usually carried out in a natural cycle or in a programmed cycle in which the endometrium is exogenously stimulated following down-regulation of the hypophysis. To analyse the possibility that the programmed cycle for embryo transfer can still be hormonally manipulated without the use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) we have conducted a prospective randomized study that compared the outcome of frozen–thawed embryo transfer cycles using micronized 17β-Oestradiol and micronized progesterone preparations with and without the concomitant use of GnRHa. One hundred and six patients were randomly divided into two groups. In group A (53 patients) 4 mg/​day of micronized 17β-oestradiol was initiated following down-regulation of hypophysis. In group B (53 patients) oestrogen stimulation started on day 1 of the cycle without prior pituitary down-regulation using a dose of 6 mg/​day for 7 days. In both groups, micronized progesterone in a dose of 900 mg/​day was administered vaginally after at least 12 days of oestrogen stimulation. Embryo transfer embryo transfer took place 48-72 h thereafter according to the cryopreserved embryonic stage. Overall, none of the patients had any follicular development and only one cycle in group B had to be cancelled because of premature progesterone secretion. The two groups did not differ in age (31 ± 5.6 and 31 ± 5.0 years), number of embryos transferred per patient (3.4 ± 1.2 and 3.3 ± 1.0), and day of progesterone initiation (15 ± 2.2 and 15 ± 1.9 for groups A and B respectively). The endometrial thickness on the day of progesterone initiation was comparable in both groups (11 ± 1.6 and 10 ± 1.6 mm for groups A and B respectively). Similarly, the pregnancy rate per embryo transfer and implantation rate in group A (26.4% and 9.5%) were comparable to those of group B (21.1% and 9%). These results indicate that programmed cycles can be successfully applied by administering a high dose of micronized 17β-oestradiol starting on day 1 of the cycle. Compared to GnRHa programmed cycles, this approach is simpler, more convenient for both the patient and medical staff, and results in a similar success rate at a lower cost.
Terms of Use
  • Copyright (C) 1998, European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Language
  • English
Contributed by
OAIster

Get this edition

  • Set up My libraries

    How do I set up "My libraries"?

    In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen.

  • All (1)
  • Unknown (1)
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment