Yet Another Tale of Two Cities: Buenos Aires and Chicago
Edward L. Glaeser
Buenos Aires and Chicago grew during the nineteenth century for remarkably similar reasons. Both cities were conduits for moving meat and grain from fertile hinterlands to eastern markets. However, despite their initial similarities, Chicago was vastly more prosperous for most of the 20th century. Can the differences between the cities after 1930 be explained by differences in the cities before that date? We highlight four major differences between Buenos Aires and Chicago in 1914. Chicago was slightly richer, and significantly better educated. Chicago was more industrially developed, with about 2.25 times more capital per worker. Finally, Chicagoâ€™s political situation was far more stable and it wasnâ€™t a political capital. Human capital seems to explain the lionâ€™s share of the divergent path of the two cities and their countries, both because of its direct effect and because of the connection between education and political instability.
In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to,
you must first login
or sign up.
Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by
clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen.