How Well Do We Measure Training? Barron, John M; Berger, Mark C; Black, Dan A

User activity

Share to:
View the summary of this work
Authors
Barron, John M ; Berger, Mark C ; Black, Dan A
Appears In
Journal of Labor Economics
Subjects
Employee training -- Analysis; Employee trainers -- Analysis; Economics
Audience
Academic; Trade
Summary
This article compares various measures of on-the-job training, from a new source that matches establishments and workers, allowing us to compare the responses of employers and employees to identical training questions. Establishments report 25% more hours of training than do workers, although workers and establishments report similar incidence rates of training. Both establishment and worker measures agree that there is much more informal training than formal training. Further, informal training is measured about as accurately as formal training. Finally, we show that measurement error reduces substantially the observed effect of training, in particular the effect of training on productivity growth.
Bookmark
http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/184504
Work ID
184504

2 editions of this work

Find a specific edition
Thumbnail [View as table] [View as grid] Title, Author, Edition Date Language Format Libraries

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this work

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this work

Add a comment


Show comments and reviews from Amazon users