Spatial effects of 'mill' closures: Does distance matter? Grimes, Arthur; Young, Chris

User activity

Send to:
View the summary of this work
Authors
Grimes, Arthur ; Young, Chris
Appears In
Australasian Journal of Regional Studies
Subjects
Cities and towns -- Social aspects; Cities and towns -- Economic aspects; Social policy
Audience
Academic
Summary
When small towns experience a major shock, such as a 'mill' closure, the effects can be devastating. We analyse the effects of two major meat works closures in New Zealand, Patea (1982) and Whakatu (1986). These examples provide an interesting comparison: Whakatu is located close to a city, while Patea is relatively isolated. We describe the impacts of these shocks on population, employment and housing in each town, and contrast adjustment dynamics resulting from their differing locations. Both towns experience negative population and employment impacts; however, consistent with benefits of a near-city location, the effects on Whakatu are mainly temporary, whereas the effects on Patea are more permanent. Population age-groups respond differently to the shocks, consistent with homeownership being a factor stifling migration responsiveness. The results have implications for regional development policy and programmes designed to stimulate homeownership. KEYWORDS: Mill closures; rural infrastructure; homeownership
Bookmark
http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/164918275
Work ID
164918275

2 editions of this work

Find a specific edition
Thumbnail [View as table] [View as grid] Title, Author, Edition Date Language Format Libraries

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this work

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this work

Add a comment


Show comments and reviews from Amazon users