Information and Consumer Choice: The Value of Publicized Health Plan Ratings Jin, Ginger Zhe; Sorensen, Alan T.

User activity

Share to:
View the summary of this work
Authors
Jin, Ginger Zhe ; Sorensen, Alan T.
Subjects
Health insurance.; Consumers' preferences.; health plan choice
Summary
"We use data on the enrollment decisions of federal annuitants to estimate the influence of publicizedratings on health plan choice. We focus on the impact of ratings disseminated by the NationalCommittee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), and use our estimates to calculate the value of theinformation. Our approach exploits a novel feature of the data—the availability of nonpublic plan ratings—to correct for a source of bias that is inherent in studies of consumer responsiveness toinformation on product quality: since publicized ratings are correlated with other quality signalsknown to consumers (but unobserved by researchers), the estimated influence of ratings is likely tobe overstated. We control for this bias by comparing the estimated impact of publicized ratings tothe estimated impact of ratings that were never disclosed. The results indicate that NCQA's planratings had a meaningful influence on individuals' choices, particularly for individuals choosing aplan for the first time. Although we estimate that a very small fraction of individual decisions werematerially affected by the information, for those that were affected the implied utility gains aresubstantial"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Bookmark
http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/132126
Work ID
132126

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this work

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this work

Add a comment


Show comments and reviews from Amazon users