English, Article, Journal or magazine article edition: Automatic Stabilisers and Market Flexibility in EMU: Is There A Trade-Off? Marco Buti; Carlos Martinez-Mongay; Khalid Sekkat; ...

User activity

Share to:
 
Bookmark: http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/136637
Physical Description
  • preprint
Language
  • English

Edition details

Title
  • Automatic Stabilisers and Market Flexibility in EMU: Is There A Trade-Off?
Author
  • Marco Buti
  • Carlos Martinez-Mongay
  • Khalid Sekkat
  • Paul van den Noord
Physical Description
  • preprint
Notes
  • It is often claimed that tax and welfare reforms that aim at enhancing efficiency may come at the cost of cyclical stabilisation. Reducing the generosity of welfare systems and lowering taxes may boost efficiency and output, and improve market adjustment to shocks. But, by reducing the size of automatic stabilisers, it may also imply less cyclical smoothing. This would be unwelcome in EMU given the loss of national monetary autonomy and the well-known pitfalls of active fiscal management. This paper argues that the alleged trade-off between efficiency/​flexibility and stabilisation may not exist. We show that, if the initial level of the tax burden is high, reducing it may lead to higher output stabilisation in the event of a supply shock and higher inflation stabilisation in the event of a demand shock. The threshold level of taxation depends on the preferences of the central bank over inflation and output. Econometric and numerical simulations show that European countries — ... Stabilisateurs automatiques et flexibilité de marchés de l'UEM. Y-a-t-il un compromis ? On a souvent proclamé que les réformes fiscales et sociales ayant pour objectif d'augmenter l'efficacité économique pouvaient se faire au détriment de la stabilisation des cycles économiques. En effet, la réduction de la générosité des systèmes de sécurité sociale et l'abaissement des impôts tendent à accroître l'efficacité de l'activité économique et à améliorer la capacité d'ajustement des marchés aux chocs. Cependant, réduire la taille des stabilisateurs automatiques peut également impliquer une augmentation des oscillations cycliques. Cela serait contrariant au sein de l'UEM, étant donné la perte d'autonomie monétaire au niveau national, ainsi que les problèmes associés à l’activisme fiscal. Cet article établi que la contradiction potentielle entre efficacité/​flexibilité et stabilisation peut ne pas exister. Nous montrons que, lorsque le niveau initial des prélèvements obligatoires est élevé, sa réduction peut renforcer la stabilisation de la production en réponse à un choc ...
  • fiscal policy, automatic stabilisers, stabilisateurs automatiques, politique fiscale, Economic and Monetary Union, shocks, Union économique et monétaire, choc
  • RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:335-en
Language
  • English
Contributed by
OAIster

Get this edition

Other links

  • Set up My libraries

    How do I set up "My libraries"?

    In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen.

  • All (1)
  • Unknown (1)
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.
None of your libraries hold this item.

User activity


e.g. test cricket, Perth (WA), "Parkes, Henry"

Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.

Be the first to add a tag for this edition

Be the first to add this to a list

Comments and reviews

What are comments? Add a comment

No user comments or reviews for this version

Add a comment