Text corrections
NEW FILMS REVIEWED "Smithy"
The Sydney Morning Herald (NSW : 1842 - 1954) Monday 1 July 1946, page 6
Article
The Sydney Morning Herald (NSW : 1842 - 1954) Monday 1 July 1946, page 6
Article
| Changed | By | Old Lines | New Lines |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-05-09 06:00:46.0 | user:public:Brooksie | ¡NEW FILMS REVIEWED, the name ol' Columbia Pictures, who financed the making ol' it, Mr. N. P. Pery. Jt is his work, C. E. Kingsford-smith, as a figure ing in a review of a film whicb doe? just thai, lu fact, the film tells very But it evades (but issue ol' criticism ably a ; good, film,'entertaining, and well photographed from start, to fin- ish, with technical qualities , which tune,eulogies. The technical qualities, thing in the film except the facis. fine sustained scieen character of X to his departure into blue «.kies au a worn-out flier' of 37. a man who has out-flown bis nerves-but neither War (1. Mr. Randall deserves the piece of work'. The role has some dull verbal patches, but. allowing for li"ing or the dead, it succeeds well. Muriel Steinbeck- makes a good Tate (Ulm) and Jdy Nicholls (Kay) still just "Billy" as tar as this re- nage. particularly in the melodrama I (t is desirable to reter oace more ¡ to technical aspects of the picture, ! having granted us genuine entertain j ment value. Ooc most noticeable im- ! beyond reproach. The photographic experts, who have seen the picture. whicb needs no apologies aod no head-hanging on the part of ourselves I It has more than its share of quiedy time you see" it, any more than you will resent some iodifferent and un- The cast is large; tbe film (almost mise ot it is even larger, and one before too long, at that! (State.) j | NEW FILMS REVIEWED the name of Columbia Pictures, who financed the making of it, Mr. N. P. Pery. It is his work, C. E. Kingsford-Smith, as a figure ing in a review of a film which does just that. ln fact, the film tells very But it evades that issue of criticism ably a good film, entertaining, and well photographed from start to fin- ish, with technical qualities which tune eulogies. The technical qualities, thing in the film except the facts. fine sustained screen character of I to his departure into blue skies as a worn-out flier of 37, a man who has out-flown his nerves-but neither War II. Mr. Randall deserves the piece of work. The role has some dull verbal patches, but allowing for living or the dead, it succeeds well. Muriel Steinbeck makes a good Tate (Ulm) and Joy Nicholls (Kay) still just "Billy" as far as this re- nage, particularly in the melodrama It is desirable to reter oace more to technical aspects of the picture, having granted us genuine entertain ment value. Ooc most noticeable im- beyond reproach. The photographic experts who have seen the picture. which needs no apologies and no head-hanging on the part of ourselves It has more than its share of quietly time you see it, any more than you will resent some indifferent and un- The cast is large; the film (almost mise of it is even larger, and one before too long, at that! (State.) |