Lists (None yet)

Login to create lists

Comments (None yet)

Add New Comment

1 correction by SheffieldPark - Show corrections

. ORIGINAL CORRESPONDENCE.

. THE PUNT AT MURCHISON.

To the Editor of the Argus.

Sir,- Fully coinciding in what your correspondent, "A Murchison Landowner," says   of the importance of the Punt at Murchison, by means of which a saving to miners and other travellers of thirty miles (and more) is effected, and that the Government ought to purchase the punt as a public convenience, I   must at the same time correct the statement he has heard made,- that the proprietors of the punt refused to sell it.

Allow me to premise that I, also, am a landowner of Hutchison, but have no sort of share or private interest in the punt. By mere chance, however, the following curious story reached me, the truth of which I have every reason to believe.-  

The Government demanded a very high rate of tax upon the punt. The proprietors remonstrated. The Government officials said that the reason for demanding a much higher tax than upon several other punts was on   account of the great traffic,- in fact, the money made by the Muichison Punt. Thereupon the proprietors offered to sell the punt at a price somewhat proportioned to the value thus set upon it. The Government then   instituted a second inquiry, and stated, as the result, that the traffic was not so great, and consequently a much less sum was offered for the punt. This the proprietors declined to accept.

No comment is required on this ludicrous way of "doing business."  

I am, Sir, your obedient servant,

. A LANDOWNER.

Zoom

plus
thumb
minus
left
thumb
right
up
thumb
down